Delegate’s name | Delegate’s signature | Course No. | |
Company name | Quality assurance experience | Years | Team |
Company business | Quality system audit experience | Years | |
Course dates | Date, Day 1 | Date, Day 2 | Date, Day 3 | Date, Day 4 | Date, Day 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competence | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Weighted average | |
Interpreting the requirements of ISO 9001 in the context of an audit (IRCA/2245 2.1.3). | PR-01 WO-01 WO-02 WO-03 | WO-04 | WO-09 WO-10 |
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Planning and preparing an audit. (IRCA/2245 2.1.5a and IRCA/2000 2.6.2b). |
| WO-05 WO-06 WO-07 |
|
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gathering objective evidence, through effective interviewing observation, sampling and note taking. (IRCA/2245 2.1.5b and IRCA/2000 2.6.2a). |
|
| WO-09 WO-10 |
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Analysing and interpreting information in order to determine conformance with requirements. (IRCA/2245 2.1.5c and IRCA/2000 2.6.2b). |
|
| WO-09 WO-10 |
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reporting the audit, including writing valid, factual and value adding nonconformity reports. (IRCA/2245 2.1.6). |
|
| WO-09 WO-10 | WO-11 | WO-12 |
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Personal attributes: manner, attitude and suitability as an auditor. (IRCA/2000 2.6.2c, d). | All lectures and workshops |
|
|
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Attendance, punctuality and participation. (IRCA/2000 2.6.2e). | All lectures and workshops |
|
|
|
|
| |
Score |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pass/Fail | First instructor (Print Name) | Second Instructor (Print Name) | |||||
(Delete as applicable) | First instructor (Signature) | Second Instructor (Signature) | |||||
Performance in each area of competence is scored from 1 - 10 (1 - 2 = well below standard, 3 - 4 = below standard, 5 - 6 = acceptable standard, 7 - 8 = above standard and 9 - 10 = well above standard). The instructor notes give guidance on scoring for each workshop. To pass the course, delegates must average at least 6 for each competence. Delegates are not assessed on every competence area every day. Greyed areas show days when continuous assessment for particular learning objectives is not timetabled. Workshops shown in bold type have greater important in measuring competence and therefore should have a proportionally greater impact in measuring the weighted average. Similarly more emphasis should be place on workshops during the latter part of the course since this reflects the learning curve.
Guidance or counselling
|
Record of improved performance |
Reasons for a fail course decision |
Copyright © 2019- hyl365.com 版权所有
违法及侵权请联系：TEL:199 18 7713 E-MAIL:2724546146@qq.com
本站由北京市万商天勤律师事务所王兴未律师提供法律服务